I received a PRRA notification
Start with the date it was given or mailed. Your notification controls the filing instructions and deadline.
Pre-Removal Risk Assessment in Canada
Maybe CBSA gave you a package called a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment, or PRRA.
Maybe your refugee claim was refused.
Maybe your claim was not referred to the Immigration and Refugee Board because of the new asylum eligibility rules.
Maybe you have been in Canada for more than one year and are worried that PRRA will be your only chance to explain the danger you face.
You may be asking:
A PRRA usually arrives when the removal process is already becoming real. The deadline can be short, and most applications are decided mainly from the written record.
Before collecting documents, you need to understand three things:
What notice did you receive? What deadline applies? What evidence is the officer allowed to consider?
Start with the date it was given or mailed. Your notification controls the filing instructions and deadline.
The officer will review the earlier refugee record. Restrictions may apply to the evidence you can present now.
PRRA may become the process through which your protection risk is assessed. It is not the same as a Refugee Protection Division hearing.
A later PRRA does not create a stay of removal and does not create PRRA-based work authorization.
Establish immediately whether a stay of removal exists. Submitting an application does not always stop removal.
A Pre-Removal Risk Assessment examines the danger you say you would face if Canada removed you.
The officer considers whether removal would expose you to:
PRRA is not an appeal to the Immigration and Refugee Board.
CBSA is involved in the removal and notification process. IRCC decides the PRRA application. The IRB does not decide it.
Most PRRA applications are decided from:
Your documents therefore need to explain the case clearly without relying on a later opportunity to tell the whole story in person.
You normally cannot start a PRRA simply because you believe you face danger. You generally need to be formally notified that you may apply.
Some people cannot apply for PRRA.
You are generally barred if:
A person normally has to wait 12 months after:
Withdrawing an application is therefore not always neutral. It can affect when PRRA becomes available again.
Canada sometimes creates country-based exemptions to the 12-month waiting period when conditions change suddenly.
An exemption does not depend only on nationality. It also depends on the type and date of the earlier decision.
The safest starting point is to identify the exact earlier decision and its date.
The most important document on this page is not this page.
It is your notification.
The usual rule is that the completed application must be received within 15 days from the date notification is given.
When the notification is sent by mail, it is treated as having been given seven days after the day it was sent.
That creates the commonly described 22-day period:
Seven days for deemed delivery, followed by the 15-day filing period.
The calculation runs from when the package was sent, not from the day you happened to open the envelope.
If you were away, moved, or opened the package late, you may already have used part of the filing period.
Your notification may also give you a separate date for written submissions and supporting evidence. Read the entire package carefully.
When the completed application is received within the 15-day filing period, the application cannot be decided until at least 30 days after notification was given.
This is why protecting the filing deadline comes first.
Filing the required form on time preserves the process. The remaining submissions and evidence must then be completed within the applicable instructions and deadlines.
The application uses:
Current IRCC guidance identifies two filing methods:
An online submission is treated as received when it is recorded in Canada Post Connect.
Filing methods and addresses can change. Follow the instructions in your own notification and confirm the current IRCC guidance before submitting.
Review current IRCC filing instructions →If your deadline is within the next few days, protect the required filing first. Do not wait for a consultation while the deadline continues to run.
A paid consultation can help you understand the notice, calculate the immediate deadline and organize the next steps. It does not itself submit the application or extend the filing period.
Full preparation and filing require a separate representation agreement.
When CBSA or IRCC formally notifies you that you may apply for PRRA, the removal order is stayed from that moment.
You do not create the stay by submitting the application.
You keep the stay in effect by filing the completed application within the required period.
The stay ends if:
Different ending rules apply after a positive PRRA or to applicants in the restricted category under subsection 112(3).
The following PRRA applications do not result in a statutory stay of removal:
If you have a removal date and no statutory stay applies, that is a separate and urgent legal issue.
A lawyer may need to assess Federal Court judicial review and whether a stay motion is available.
Filing for judicial review does not automatically stop removal.
Read IRPR section 232 →The new asylum eligibility rules can prevent certain claims from being referred to the Refugee Protection Division.
These restrictions apply only to claims made on or after June 3, 2025.
They create two separate situations.
This branch may apply where:
The rule can apply even if you later left Canada and returned.
This branch may apply where:
Unaccompanied minors are exempt from these new restrictions.
If your claim is found ineligible under one of these provisions, PRRA may become the process through which your protection risk is assessed.
Access to PRRA is not the same as approval.
Bill C-12 and Refugee-Claim Eligibility in Canada →These are related questions, but they are not the same question.
A work permit authorizes work.
Temporary resident status determines whether you hold status as a worker, student or visitor.
A stay of removal prevents enforcement of a removal order while the stay remains in effect.
One does not automatically create the others.
When formal notification creates a stay, the removal order becomes unenforceable while that stay remains in effect.
This can open the PRRA-related route to a work permit, provided the applicable requirements are met.
A current permit must still be checked for:
When a removal order becomes enforceable, an existing work permit can be cancelled under the regulations.
A temporary public policy dated March 26, 2026 was created for certain people whose refugee claims were found ineligible.
The policy may allow an eligible person to:
The policy exists because time may pass between the ineligibility finding and formal PRRA notification.
It is temporary, subject to conditions, and can be changed or revoked.
Read the temporary work-permit public policy →A late PRRA or a second or later PRRA does not create PRRA-based work authorization.
An existing work permit is usually already cancelled once the removal order becomes enforceable. Any separate authorization is therefore a narrow exception and must be verified before the person continues working.
No.
A stay prevents removal while it remains in effect. It does not restore or extend temporary resident status.
IRCC identifies Interim Federal Health Program coverage for two relevant groups:
IFHP is a federal program.
Eligibility for provincial health coverage is a separate question and depends on provincial rules.
Review IRCC information about work and health coverage →The question is not simply whether the document is new.
The question is: Is the officer legally allowed to consider it now?
Where your refugee claim was already rejected, restrictions apply to evidence presented in PRRA.
The evidence generally needs to:
A recently created document is not automatically new evidence.
For example:
The application should explain:
If a previous PRRA was refused, the earlier record and the evidence being presented again must be examined carefully.
A country can be dangerous without every person from that country qualifying for protection. The officer asks whether you personally face a legally recognized risk.
Credibility and consistency
The officer starts with identity. Your citizenship, family relationships, residence history, travel, political or religious profile and identity documents must fit together.
Example: You say you lived in one region for ten years, but your passport, employment records and earlier forms show a different history. The application needs to explain that difference.
Credibility and decision logic
The officer looks at who or what is the source of the risk, what they are expected to do, why they remain interested in you, and what is likely to happen if you return now.
Past harm can be important. The officer still needs to understand why the danger exists today.
Example: A threat from five years ago proves a past event. It does not automatically prove the same person remains at risk now.
Corroboration and evidence quality
Country reports show what happens generally. Your application must connect those conditions to your identity, location, activities, history and source of risk.
Example: A report may show that political activists are arrested. Your evidence must still establish that you are known as an activist and would be identified on return.
Evidence quality and decision logic
The officer considers whether meaningful protection is available and whether another part of the country offers a safe and reasonable alternative.
A general statement such as “the police are corrupt” is usually not enough.
The application should show what protection was requested, how the authorities responded, why further attempts would be ineffective or dangerous, whether the source of risk can reach you elsewhere, and why relocation would not solve the danger.
Credibility, consistency and sufficiency
Credibility asks whether the evidence is believed.
Sufficiency asks whether the evidence proves the legal risk.
A person can be truthful and still fail if the evidence does not establish enough.
Your PRRA does not start with a blank page.
The officer compares it with:
A contradiction is not automatically fatal.
But a contradiction you ignore can become more damaging than one you identify and explain.
If an earlier decision questioned why you never mentioned an important event, simply adding it to a new affidavit does not answer the concern. The application should explain why it was absent before.
A large file is not necessarily a clear file. A PRRA record should show:
Why should the important facts be believed?
Do the forms, statements and documents fit together?
What independent evidence supports the account?
Is the evidence reliable, current and connected to the issue?
Can the officer follow the path from the facts and evidence to the legal risk?
The purpose is not to overwhelm the officer with documents.
It is to make the decision understandable.
Read the Immigreen Evidentiary Clarity Framework →An evidence review can identify:
Most PRRA applications are decided from the written record.
A hearing is not automatic.
For the usual discretionary hearing, three factors normally need to be present:
Even where all three factors exist, the officer decides whether a hearing is required.
A hearing is mandatory in a specific situation under section 113.01 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. This can apply where a claim was not referred to the IRB only because information-sharing records showed that the person had previously made a refugee claim in another country, unless the PRRA can be allowed without a hearing.
It is not a new refugee hearing.
The notice identifies the factual issues the officer wants to address. The hearing is normally limited to those issues.
The officer leads the questioning. Legal arguments belong primarily in the written submissions. Witnesses cannot simply be added as of right.
Leaving Canada while PRRA is pending causes the application to be declared abandoned and rejected.
If you miss a hearing, the application is not immediately abandoned. You must be given notice of another hearing. Abandonment can follow if you also fail to attend that further hearing.
Read IRPA section 113.01 →A document that is not in English or French must be accompanied by a compliant translation.
The translation must either:
The translator cannot be:
If the document does not meet the translation requirements, the officer will not consider it.
Each family member in Canada who is 18 years of age or older and is also applying must complete their own PRRA application.
One adult’s application does not automatically cover the others.
Connected family applications also need to remain consistent. Different dates, different versions of the same event or conflicting family histories can affect every file.
For most applicants, an allowed PRRA gives refugee protection.
Permanent residence is a separate application. A positive PRRA does not itself complete the permanent-residence process.
Different rules apply to people described in subsection 112(3), including some applicants with serious inadmissibility concerns.
For these restricted applicants:
A positive decision obtained through misrepresentation can later be vacated.
A refusal allows the removal process to continue unless another legal stay exists.
Federal Court judicial review may be available.
For a matter arising in Canada, the application for leave and judicial review is generally filed within 15 days after the person is notified of or becomes aware of the decision.
Judicial review does not automatically stop removal.
If removal is scheduled, a lawyer may need to assess a separate stay motion immediately.
The applicant may also request the officer’s file notes recording the justification for the decision. Those notes can be important when deciding whether judicial review should be pursued.
Immigreen can assist with the PRRA and immigration record. Federal Court advice and representation must be handled by a lawyer or by a self-represented litigant. Where appropriate, Immigreen can help organize the immigration record and coordinate a handoff to court counsel.
Judicial Review of an IRCC Refusal →PRRA asks whether removal exposes you to a protection risk.
An H&C application asks whether humanitarian and compassionate circumstances justify an exemption that may allow permanent residence. An H&C application does not stop removal.
Judicial review asks whether a decision was legally flawed. It does not reassess the application as a new PRRA.
The correct route depends on the decision, deadline, evidence and objective. More than one process may need to be considered, but they do not replace one another.
Humanitarian and Compassionate Considerations →Start with:
Do not begin by downloading hundreds of pages of country reports.
Begin with the decision the officer must make.
Protect the filing date first.
The earlier concerns remain part of the record.
The application must explain why the officer is legally allowed to consider it.
The reports must connect to your personal circumstances.
Confirm whether formal notification created a stay. Late, subsequent and specified border applications do not.
IRCC does not require you to hire a representative. Hiring one does not change the legal test or guarantee a favourable result.
Representation can help with:
The value is not that a representative changes the rules.
The value is making sure the genuine case is presented clearly within them.
You may need:
Usually not. PRRA normally begins after the Department formally notifies you that you may apply.
No. When the package is mailed, notification is normally deemed given seven days after it was sent. The 15-day filing period runs from that deemed notification date.
A later PRRA may become available after the applicable waiting period. It does not create a statutory stay of removal or PRRA-based work authorization.
Each family member in Canada aged 18 or older who is applying completes their own application. Connected family records should remain consistent.
It depends on whether you were formally notified, whether a stay exists, whether your claim was found ineligible, whether the temporary public policy applies and whether any valid authorization remains.
IFHP coverage is available to specific groups, including certain people notified after a refugee-claim ineligibility finding and people who receive a positive PRRA decision. Provincial health coverage is separate.
Usually not. A hearing occurs only in defined circumstances.
Leaving Canada causes the application to be declared abandoned and rejected.