IRCC Reconsideration Request
A reconsideration request asks IRCC to reopen and re-examine a refused application. It is discretionary, not guaranteed, and must be carefully prepared.
Last updated: May 2026
Reconsideration is not an appeal. It asks the same office to revisit a decision based on new evidence or a clear factual error. Success depends on identifying a reviewable issue in the original decision, not simply disagreeing with the outcome.
What Is a Reconsideration Request?
A reconsideration request is a written submission asking IRCC to review a decision that has already been made. Unlike a reapplication, it does not start a new file. Instead, it asks the same office or a different officer to look at the existing decision again.
Reconsideration is not a formal appeal. There is no legal right to reconsideration. IRCC may choose to reopen a file, but it is under no obligation to do so.
When Is Reconsideration Appropriate?
Reconsideration is most appropriate when:
- The officer made a clear factual error (e.g., misread a document or ignored submitted evidence)
- A procedural fairness issue occurred (e.g., decision made without considering all evidence)
- New evidence directly addresses the officer's concerns and was not available at the time of the original decision
Reconsideration is generally not appropriate when:
- The applicant simply disagrees with the decision
- No new information or evidence exists
- The refusal was based on a reasonable assessment of the evidence
Reconsideration vs Reapplication vs Judicial Review
Reconsideration: Asks IRCC to reopen the same file. Discretionary. No guaranteed timeline.
Reapplication: Submits a new application addressing refusal reasons. Starts a fresh review.
Judicial Review: Asks Federal Court to examine whether the decision was lawful and reasonable. Strict deadlines apply (15 or 60 days).
In many cases, a properly prepared reapplication is more effective than a reconsideration request. For more on judicial review, see: Judicial Review of IRCC Refusals.
How to Prepare a Reconsideration Request
A strong reconsideration request should:
- Clearly identify the error or oversight
- Reference specific documents or facts that were missed
- Be concise and professional
- Avoid emotional language or general complaints
- Include supporting evidence where applicable
Common Mistakes in Reconsideration Requests
- Repeating the same arguments without new evidence
- Writing long, emotional letters instead of focused submissions
- Failing to identify the specific error in the decision
- Waiting too long after the refusal (though there is no strict deadline for most reconsiderations)
How We Can Help
Before requesting reconsideration, the refusal should be properly analyzed. GCMS notes can help identify whether the decision contains reviewable errors. If reconsideration is appropriate, the request must be focused, evidence-based, and professionally written.
If you received a refusal and want to determine whether reconsideration is the right approach, you can book a consultation for a structured assessment.